<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Price Comparison: MacBook vs DELL Notebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/2008/10/16/price-comparison-macbook-vs-dell-notebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/2008/10/16/price-comparison-macbook-vs-dell-notebook/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/2008/10/16/price-comparison-macbook-vs-dell-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/?p=336#comment-31</guid>
		<description>It is good they&#039;re competing better on prices, on a like for like basis, but I can&#039;t help feeling that while the new Macbooks are really nicely made etc, price wise they&#039;re a but much for the consumer MacBook.  The finish, and thus price has now nudged them into a higher bracket and while I don&#039;t question their value for money, the entry point (ignoring the single white MacBook left to soldier on) is basically higher than it was.  I&#039;d call them a 13&quot; MacBook Pro as opposed to a plain MacBook.
I would prefer to see the pricing of the MacBooks remain in a £699 - £9990 bracket.  Ideally starting at £599 actually (I don&#039;t think Apple can get one out under £500 as it would mean using very outdated components and cutting too many corners).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good they&#8217;re competing better on prices, on a like for like basis, but I can&#8217;t help feeling that while the new Macbooks are really nicely made etc, price wise they&#8217;re a but much for the consumer MacBook.  The finish, and thus price has now nudged them into a higher bracket and while I don&#8217;t question their value for money, the entry point (ignoring the single white MacBook left to soldier on) is basically higher than it was.  I&#8217;d call them a 13&#8243; MacBook Pro as opposed to a plain MacBook.<br />
I would prefer to see the pricing of the MacBooks remain in a £699 &#8211; £9990 bracket.  Ideally starting at £599 actually (I don&#8217;t think Apple can get one out under £500 as it would mean using very outdated components and cutting too many corners).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kancer</title>
		<link>http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/2008/10/16/price-comparison-macbook-vs-dell-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>kancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightsourcemedia.co.uk/blog/?p=336#comment-30</guid>
		<description>i think both cards are the same, though the 9400m runs at a different clock speed(which can be achieved by an overclocked 8400m) but its nice to know that apple is cutting down its prices.

judging that both are 13.3&#039; laptops, currently, you cant really go any faster than that.

though wish apple would release a 14&#039; notebook with a 9600M GT. that would be sweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think both cards are the same, though the 9400m runs at a different clock speed(which can be achieved by an overclocked 8400m) but its nice to know that apple is cutting down its prices.</p>
<p>judging that both are 13.3&#8242; laptops, currently, you cant really go any faster than that.</p>
<p>though wish apple would release a 14&#8242; notebook with a 9600M GT. that would be sweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

